Thoughts on Day 21 of Ramadan: Critical Analysis of History & Intellectual Terrorism

On the 21st of Ramadan which is the day of the martyrdom of Imam Ali bin Abi Talib (KW), I reflect on the importance of early Islamic history.  More specifically, I continue to think about how romanticizing this history not only lacks intellectual integrity, but it is also counterproductive for the Ummah in solving its current issues.  If we can’t be intellectually honest and mature about our past then we certainly cannot be honest and mature about the present.

The first three generation of Muslims, which are commonly referred to as the “Righteous Predecessors” achieved much.  The elite among them were the first to embrace Islam in Makkah during adversities, migrated to Al-Madinah, struggled in the path of Allah and maintained their faith after the passing of the Prophet (SAWS), for those who lived past him.  They and their children’s generation oversaw the Qur’an being placed into text (mushaf) form and spread Islam to Greater Syria (Sham), Egypt, Persia to the gates of China.

There was, however, also some ugliness in this era.  Some companions of the Prophet (SAWS) were killed by other Muslims.  Others were oppressed by other Muslims.  Governors under the khilaafah misused the Muslim treasury and even one did this plus stayed drunk and was later whipped for it.

According to majority contemporary Sunni thought, every Muslim who met the Prophet (SAWS) and prayed behind him was a companion, and that every companion is deemed just (‘adl.)  To accept or question this notion is not a mere philosophical exercise; it has real day implications on how Islam is understood and implemented today.

Can a Muslim who killed other Muslims be considered just and that Allah (SWT) should be pleased with him/her?

Can one narrate ahadeeth from a person and take his/her opinions as authoritative simply because he/she was from the first two generations?

When looking at how Abu Dharr (RA) was exiled and the reasons behind it and how Abdullah bin Ma’sud (RA) was removed from being a judge in Iraq and later died due to being beaten, it is evident that injustice spread, including being perpetrated by some who are considered companions.  But because companions have been given de facto infallibility (‘ismah) though there is zero theological basis for this, it is seen as heretical almost to discuss what is clearly in the Islamic history books.

These issues were rigorously debated in earlier generations unlike today.  Unfortunately, intellectual terrorism shut down debate due to name-calling and even violence against Islamic thinkers and scholars.

For instance, it’s narrated in Masaa’il Al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal that the second generation Muslim who Al-Bukhari deemed trustworthy named Ali bin Al-Ja’ad (RH) stated, “Mu’awiyah [bin Abi Sufyan], I swear by Allah, died upon other than Islam.”  Some modern day Salafis have dismissed Ali bin Al-Ja’ad (RH) though he was deemed by early Sunni hadeeth narrators as strong.

Abu Hanifah (RH) and Sufyan Ath-Thawri (RH) both deemed Imam Ali (KW) superior to ‘Uthman and supported the revolution of Imam Zayd bin Ali bin Al-Husayn bin Ali bin Abi Talib (SA) against the Ummawi tyrant Hisham bin Abdil Malik.  Abu Hanifah (RH) was later imprisoned, and Imam Zayd (SA) was decapitated as his grandfather Imam Al-Husayn (SA) was due to his revolution.

Malik (RH) later supported the revolution of An-Nafs Az-Zakiyyah Muhammad bin Abdillah bin Al-Hasan bin Al-Hasan bin Ali bin Abi Talib (SA) against the first Abbasi tyrant Abu Ja’fari Al-Mansur.  Malik (RH), like Abu Hanifah (RH), was imprisoned as well as beaten.

An-Nasa’i (RH), who narrated a book on the virtues of Imam Ali (KW) was beaten to death by zealots, who accused him of being “Rafidi” because he stated he had nothing meritorious to narrate about Mu’awiyah.

It’s amazing that persons who fought and killed Muslims, including the Prophet’s (SAWS) family and companions and never publicly repented, cannot be questioned as to their merits or lack thereof.

Again, this speaks to our framework of what justice means and who we take our theology and jurisprudence from.  Creed and jurisprudence have been influenced by this such as the contemporary Sunni belief that it’s not allowed to rise up against a Muslim leader if he establishes prayer.  If that’s the case, then Imam Zayd (SA), Abu Hanifah (RH) and Malik (RH) were not on the “Sunnah,” which would be an outrageous proposition indeed.

There are some contemporary scholars that have been brave enough to discuss such issues.  Of course, they too have been labeled as being “Rafidi” as Ash-Shafi’i (RH), An-Nasa’i (RH), At-Tabari (RH) and others were labeled by intellectual terrorists.

Shaykh Muhammad ibn Yahya An-Ninowy is one such who calls into question Marwan ibn Al-Hakam and the “Ummawi media,” which facilitated the murder of Imam Al-Husayn bin Ali (SA).

Other thinkers along this line who critically analysis this history, in particular, the role of Mu’awiyah in the early fitnah in the Ummah, are Dr. Adnan Ibrahim, Dr. Hasan Farhan Al-Maliki and Dr. Ahmad Al-Kubaysi.

Insha’Allah, I will continue this subject in regards to ahadeeth that contradict that the Qur’an and how they relate to this early era of Islamic history that contained much political fitnah and jockeying.

7 thoughts on “Thoughts on Day 21 of Ramadan: Critical Analysis of History & Intellectual Terrorism

  1. This was an excellent piece. Very good information. In fact the most powerful point of this whole entry is clearly stated thus, “Again, this speaks to our framework of what justice means and who we take our theology and jurisprudence from.” Wow!

    This is one of the reasons why I no longer believe the narrative of the “Ahl Sunnah Wal Jammah”. However, don’t get me wrong. This doesn’t mean I hopped over to the Ithna Asheri ship. Many Sunni Muslims will find the “Sunni” narrative wanting and become suspicious. So they may gravitate towards the 12er Shi’a without hearing the very interesting views of the Zaydi Shi’a!

    “Whoever kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, he shall abide therein forever. The wrath and the curse of Allāh shall be upon him, and a great punishment is prepared for him” (Holy Qur’an 4:93) This verse is very clear. To me this refutes the “Sunni” proposition.

    “That was a people that has passed away. They shall reap the fruit of what they did, and you of what you do! Of their merits there is no question in your case” (Holy Qur’an 2:141) &

    “And those who came after them say: “Our Lord! Forgive us, and our brethren who came before us into the Faith, and leave not, in our hearts, rancour (or sense of injury) against those who have believed. Our Lord! Thou art indeed Full of Kindness, Most Merciful.” (Holy Quran 59:10)

    This to me this also gives pause in regards to the Ithna Asheri perspective.

    I hope a new day rises in the Muslim community in which we respect the scholarship of the past, and we speak frankly and honestly about our shared narrative (which this article does). However, I hope that the narrative of the past does not have to define our future.

    I look forward to the day in which we take the truth no matter whom is upon it, Sunni, Shi’a, Ibadi, Sufi, Salafi. I look forward to the day that we put the Holy Qur’an as the centre of our shared narrative, and that we simply call ourselves ‘Muslim’.

  2. “There are even reports from the early historian al-Mada’ini that Mu’awiya encouraged systematic forging and circulation of hadiths affirming the virtues of the caliphs and Companions at Ali’s expense.”

    (cited from Al-Mada’ini’s Kitab al-ahdath; Ahmad b Sa’d al-Din al-Miswari, Al Risala al-munqidha min al-ghiwaya fi turuq al riwaya, pp. 51-55) this citation is found in Dr. Jonathan Browns book “Hadith Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World page 70”

    I would highly encourage anyone to see Dr. Khalid Blankinships very balanced ‘Sunni vs Shi’ah: A Clash of Historical Narrative’ that you can download here for 12$

    http://www.lamppostproductions.com/sunni-vs-shiah-a-clash-of-historical-narratives-dr-khalid-y-blankinship/

    Dr. Jeffery Lang in his book, “Losing my Religion: A Cry for help” has an interesting section in the ahadith and expresses his own doubts about the companions all being as right as peach cobbler.

    Needless to say, do you find Dr. Jeffery Lang on the speaking circuit much these days?

    Intellectual terrorism indeed.

  3. Pingback: Dawud Walid bringing balance to the Shia-Sunni narrative. | primaquran

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s